Welcome to NQMC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary


TITLE

Accidental puncture or laceration (provider level): rate per 1,000 discharges.

SOURCE(S)

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to patient safety indicators [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)AHRQ Pub; 2007 Mar 12. 76 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 03-R203).


  • AHRQ quality indicators. Patient safety indicators: technical specifications [version 3.2]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2008 Mar 10. 107 p.

Measure Domain

PRIMARY MEASURE DOMAIN

SECONDARY MEASURE DOMAIN

Does not apply to this measure

Brief Abstract

DESCRIPTION

This measure is used to assess the number of cases of technical difficulty (e.g., accidental cut or laceration during procedure) per 1,000 discharges.

RATIONALE

Hospitals in the United States provide the setting for some of life's most pivotal events - the birth of a child, major surgery, treatment for otherwise fatal illnesses. These hospitals house the most sophisticated medical technology in the world and provide state-of-the-art diagnostic and therapeutic services. But access to these services comes with certain costs. About 30% of personal health care expenditures in the United States go towards hospital care, and the rate of growth in spending for hospital services has only recently leveled out after several years of increases following a half a decade of declining growth. Simultaneously, concerns about the quality of health care services have reached a crescendo with the Institute of Medicine's series of reports describing the problem of medical errors and the need for a complete restructuring of the health care system to improve the quality of care. Policymakers, employers, and consumers have made the quality of care in U.S. hospitals a top priority and have voiced the need to assess, monitor, track, and improve the quality of inpatient care.

Widespread consensus exists that health care organizations can reduce patient injuries by improving the environment for safety from implementing technical changes, such as electronic medical record systems, to improving staff awareness of patient safety risks. Clinical process interventions also have strong evidence for reducing the risk of adverse events related to a patient's exposure to hospital care. Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), which are based on computerized hospital discharge abstracts from the AHRQ's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), can be used to better prioritize and evaluate local and national initiatives. Analyses of these and similar inexpensive, readily available administrative data sets may provide a screen for potential medical errors and a method for monitoring trends over time.

The Accidental Puncture or Laceration indicator is intended to flag cases of complications that arise due to technical difficulties in medical care--specifically, those involving an accidental puncture or laceration. This indicator is defined both on a provider level* and on an area level. See the related National Quality Measures Clearinghouse [NQMC] summary of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ] indicator Accidental puncture or laceration (area-level): rate per 100,000 population.

*The following concerns affect the validity of this indicator:

  • Underreporting or screening: Conditions included in this indicator may not be systematically reported (leading to an artificially low rate) or may be routinely screened for (leading to a higher rate in facilities that screen).
  • Unclear preventability: As compared to other Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), the conditions included in this indicator may be less preventable by the health system.

Refer to the original measure documentation for further information.

PRIMARY CLINICAL COMPONENT

Accidental puncture/laceration

DENOMINATOR DESCRIPTION

All surgical and medical discharges, age 18 years and older, defined by specific Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs)

Exclude cases

  • With International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code denoting technical difficulty (e.g., accidental cut, puncture, perforation, or laceration) in the principal diagnosis field or secondary diagnosis present on admission, if known
  • Major Diagnostic Category (MDC) 14 (pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium)
  • With ICD-9-CM code for spine surgery

Note: Refer to the Technical Specifications document for specific DRGs and ICD-9-CM codes.

NUMERATOR DESCRIPTION

Discharges among cases meeting the inclusion and exclusion rules for the denominator with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code denoting accidental cut, puncture, perforation, or laceration during a procedure in any secondary diagnosis field

Note: Refer to the Technical Specifications document for specific ICD-9-CM codes.

DATA SOURCE

Administrative data

Identifying Information

ORIGINAL TITLE

Accidental puncture or laceration (provider level definition) (PSI 15).

MEASURE COLLECTION

MEASURE SET NAME

DEVELOPER

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

FUNDING SOURCE(S)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

COMPOSITION OF THE GROUP THAT DEVELOPED THE MEASURE

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators are in the public domain and the specifications come from multiple sources, including the published and unpublished literature, users, researchers, and other organizations. AHRQ as an agency is responsible for the content of the indicators.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/OTHER POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None

ENDORSER

National Quality Forum

INCLUDED IN

National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR)
National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR)

ADAPTATION

This indicator was originally proposed by Iezzoni and colleagues (1994) as part of the Complications Screening Program (CSP), although unlike the final Patient Safety Indicator (PSI), its codes were split between two CSP indicators (CSP 27, "technical difficulty with medical care," and "sentinel events"). It was also included as one component of a broader indicator ("adverse events and iatrogenic complications") in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ's) original Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Quality Indicators (Elixhauser et al., 1998). The University HealthSystem Consortium adopted CSP 27 as an indicator for medical (#2806) and major surgery (#2956) patients. Miller and colleagues (2001) also split this set of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes into two broader indicators ("miscellaneous misadventures" and "E codes") in the original "AHRQ PSI Algorithms and Groupings." Based on expert consensus panels, McKesson Health Solutions included one component of this PSI (Accidental Puncture or Laceration) in its CareEnhance Resource Management Systems, Quality Profiler Complications Measures Module.

RELEASE DATE

2003 Mar

REVISION DATE

2008 Mar

MEASURE STATUS

This is the current release of the measure.

This measure updates previous versions:

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to patient safety indicators [version 3.0a]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2006 May 1. 78 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 03-R203).
  • AHRQ quality indicators. Patient safety indicators: technical specifications [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 107 p.

SOURCE(S)

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to patient safety indicators [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)AHRQ Pub; 2007 Mar 12. 76 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 03-R203).


  • AHRQ quality indicators. Patient safety indicators: technical specifications [version 3.2]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2008 Mar 10. 107 p.

MEASURE AVAILABILITY

COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

NQMC STATUS

This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI on October 1, 2003. The information was verified by the measure developer on October 29, 2003. This summary was updated by ECRI on February 7, 2005 and on April 11, 2006. The information was verified by the measure developer on July 31, 2006. This NQMC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on June 12, 2007 and again on October 15, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

No copyright restrictions apply.

Disclaimer

NQMC DISCLAIMER