Welcome to NQMC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Complete Summary


TITLE

Diabetes mellitus: hospital admission rate for uncontrolled diabetes.

SOURCE(S)

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 59 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 02-R0203).


  • AHRQ quality indicators. Prevention quality indicators: technical specifications [version 3.2]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2008 Feb 29. 22 p.

Measure Domain

PRIMARY MEASURE DOMAIN

SECONDARY MEASURE DOMAIN

Access

Brief Abstract

DESCRIPTION

This measure is used to assess the number of admissions for uncontrolled diabetes per 100,000 population.

As a Prevention Quality Indicator (PQI), uncontrolled diabetes is not a measure of hospital quality, but rather one measure of outpatient and other health care. Rates of diabetes may vary systematically by area, creating bias for this indicator.

RATIONALE

Prevention is an important role for all health care providers. Providers can help individuals stay healthy by preventing disease, and they can prevent complications of existing disease by helping patients live with their illnesses. To fulfill this role, however, providers need data on the impact of their services and the opportunity to compare these data over time or across communities. Local, State, and Federal policymakers also need these tools and data to identify potential access or quality-of-care problems related to prevention, to plan specific interventions, and to evaluate how well these interventions meet the goals of preventing illness and disability.

While these indicators use hospital inpatient data, their focus is an outpatient health care. Except in the case of patients who are readmitted soon after discharge from a hospital, the quality of inpatient care is unlikely to be a significant determinant of admission rates for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Rather, the Prevention Quality Indicators (PQIs) assess the quality of the health care system as a whole, and especially the quality of ambulatory care, in preventing medical complications. As a result, these measures are likely to be of the greatest value when calculated at the population level and when used by public health groups, State data organizations, and other organizations concerned with the health of populations.

These indicators* serve as a screening tool rather than as definitive measures of quality problems. They can provide initial information about potential problems in the community that may require further, more in-depth analysis.

Uncontrolled diabetes should be used in conjunction with short-term complications of diabetes, which include diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperosmolarity, and coma. This indicator is designed to be combined with the short-term complications of diabetes measure (see the related National Quality Measures Clearinghouse [NQMC] summary of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ] indicator Diabetes Mellitus: Hospital Admission Rate for Short-term Complications) to create the Healthy People 2010 indicator. To do so, users may simply add the rates of the two indicators together.

Proper outpatient treatment and adherence to care may reduce the incidence of uncontrolled diabetes.

*The following caveats were identified from the literature review for the "Uncontrolled Diabetes Admission Rate" indicator:

  • Proxya: Indicator does not directly measure patient outcomes but an aspect of care that is associated with the outcome; thus, it is best used with other indicators that measure similar aspects of care.
  • Confounding biasa: Patient characteristics may substantially affect the performance of the indicator; risk adjustment is recommended.
  • Easily manipulateda: Use of the indicator may create perverse incentives to improve performance on the indicator without truly improving quality of care.

Refer to the original measure documentation for further details.

Note:

a - The concern is theoretical or suggested, but no specific evidence was found in the literature.

PRIMARY CLINICAL COMPONENT

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; hospital admission rates

DENOMINATOR DESCRIPTION

Population in Metro Area or county, age 18 years and older

NUMERATOR DESCRIPTION

All non-maternal discharges, age 18 years and older, with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) principal diagnosis code* for uncontrolled diabetes, without mention of a short-term or long-term complication

Exclude cases:

  • Transferring from another institution
  • Major Diagnostic Category (MDC) 14 (pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium)
  • MDC 15 (newborn and other neonates)

*Refer to the Technical Specifications document for specific ICD-9-CM codes.

Evidence Supporting the Measure

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE VALUE OF MONITORING THE ASPECT OF POPULATION HEALTH

  • One or more research studies published in a National Library of Medicine (NLM) indexed, peer-reviewed journal

Evidence Supporting Need for the Measure

NEED FOR THE MEASURE

Monitoring health state(s)
Variation in health state(s)

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING NEED FOR THE MEASURE

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 59 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 02-R0203).

State of Use of the Measure

STATE OF USE

Current routine use

CURRENT USE

Monitoring health state(s)
National reporting

Application of Measure in its Current Use

CARE SETTING

Ambulatory Care
Community Health Care

PROFESSIONALS RESPONSIBLE FOR HEALTH CARE

Advanced Practice Nurses
Physician Assistants
Physicians
Public Health Professionals

LOWEST LEVEL OF HEALTH CARE DELIVERY ADDRESSED

Counties or Cities

TARGET POPULATION AGE

Age greater than or equal to 18 years

TARGET POPULATION GENDER

Either male or female

STRATIFICATION BY VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

Unspecified

Characteristics of the Primary Clinical Component

INCIDENCE/PREVALENCE

Unspecified

ASSOCIATION WITH VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

Minorities have higher rates of diabetes, and higher hospitalization rates may result in areas with higher minority concentrations.

EVIDENCE FOR ASSOCIATION WITH VULNERABLE POPULATIONS

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 59 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 02-R0203).

BURDEN OF ILLNESS

Unspecified

UTILIZATION

Unspecified

COSTS

Unspecified

Institute of Medicine National Healthcare Quality Report Categories

IOM CARE NEED

Living with Illness

IOM DOMAIN

Effectiveness
Timeliness

Data Collection for the Measure

CASE FINDING

Both users and nonusers of care

DESCRIPTION OF CASE FINDING

Population in Metro Area or county, age 18 years and older

DENOMINATOR SAMPLING FRAME

Geographically defined

DENOMINATOR INCLUSIONS/EXCLUSIONS

Inclusions
Population in Metro Area or county, age 18 years and older

Exclusions
Unspecified

RELATIONSHIP OF DENOMINATOR TO NUMERATOR

All cases in the denominator are not equally eligible to appear in the numerator

DENOMINATOR (INDEX) EVENT

Patient Characteristic

DENOMINATOR TIME WINDOW

Time window is a single point in time

NUMERATOR INCLUSIONS/EXCLUSIONS

Inclusions
All non-maternal discharges, age 18 years and older, with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) principal diagnosis code* for uncontrolled diabetes, without mention of a short-term or long-term complication

*Refer to the Technical Specifications document for specific ICD-9-CM codes.

Exclusions
Exclude cases:

  • Transferring from another institution
  • Major Diagnostic Category (MDC) 14 (pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium)
  • MDC 15 (newborn and other neonates)

MEASURE RESULTS UNDER CONTROL OF HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, ORGANIZATIONS AND/OR POLICYMAKERS

The measure results are somewhat or substantially under the control of the health care professionals, organizations and/or policymakers to whom the measure applies.

NUMERATOR TIME WINDOW

Institutionalization

DATA SOURCE

Administrative data

LEVEL OF DETERMINATION OF QUALITY

Does not apply to this measure

TYPE OF HEALTH STATE

Adverse Health State

PRE-EXISTING INSTRUMENT USED

Unspecified

Computation of the Measure

SCORING

Rate

INTERPRETATION OF SCORE

A lower score is desirable

ALLOWANCE FOR PATIENT FACTORS

Analysis by subgroup (stratification on patient factors, geographic factors, etc.)
Risk adjustment method widely or commercially available

DESCRIPTION OF ALLOWANCE FOR PATIENT FACTORS

Observed (raw) rates may be stratified by areas (Metro Areas or counties), age groups, race/ethnicity categories, and sex.

Risk adjustment of the data is recommended using age and sex.

Application of multivariate signal extraction (MSX) to smooth risk adjusted rates is also recommended.

STANDARD OF COMPARISON

External comparison at a point in time
External comparison of time trends
Internal time comparison
Prescriptive standard

PRESCRIPTIVE STANDARD

EVIDENCE FOR PRESCRIPTIVE STANDARD

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. Conference ed. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 2000.

Evaluation of Measure Properties

EXTENT OF MEASURE TESTING

Each potential quality indicator was evaluated against the following six criteria, which were considered essential for determining the reliability and validity of a quality indicator: face validity, precision, minimum bias, construct validity, fosters real quality improvement, and application. The project team searched Medline for articles relating to each of these six areas of evaluation. Additionally, extensive empirical testing of all potential indicators was conducted using the 1995-97 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases (SID) and Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to determine precision, bias, and construct validity. Table 1 in the original measure documentation summarizes the results of the literature review and empirical evaluations on the Prevention Quality Indicators (PQI). Refer to the original measure documentation for details.

EVIDENCE FOR RELIABILITY/VALIDITY TESTING

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 59 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 02-R0203).

Identifying Information

ORIGINAL TITLE

Uncontrolled diabetes admission rate (PQI 14).

MEASURE COLLECTION

MEASURE SET NAME

DEVELOPER

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

FUNDING SOURCE(S)

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

COMPOSITION OF THE GROUP THAT DEVELOPED THE MEASURE

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicators are in the public domain and the specifications come from multiple sources, including the published and unpublished literature, users, researchers, and other organizations. AHRQ as an agency is responsible for the content of the indicators.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/OTHER POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None

INCLUDED IN

National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR)
National Healthcare Quality Report (NHQR)

ADAPTATION

This measure corresponds closely with the measure of short-term diabetes that was developed by Billings and colleagues.

PARENT MEASURE

Unspecified

RELEASE DATE

2001 Oct

REVISION DATE

2008 Feb

MEASURE STATUS

This is the current release of the measure.

This measure updates previous versions:

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions [version 3.0a]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2006 Feb 20. 58 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 02-R0203).
  • AHRQ quality indicators. Prevention quality indicators: technical specifications [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 22 p.

SOURCE(S)

  • AHRQ quality indicators. Guide to prevention quality indicators: hospital admission for ambulatory care sensitive conditions [version 3.1]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2007 Mar 12. 59 p. (AHRQ Pub; no. 02-R0203).


  • AHRQ quality indicators. Prevention quality indicators: technical specifications [version 3.2]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ); 2008 Feb 29. 22 p.

MEASURE AVAILABILITY

COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

NQMC STATUS

This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI on December 19, 2002. The information was verified by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on January 9, 2003. This NQMC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on April 6, 2004, February 18, 2005, February 27, 2006, June 15, 2007 and again on November 26, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

No copyright restrictions apply.

Disclaimer

NQMC DISCLAIMER