Skip to main content
  • Measure Summary
  • NQMC:002248
  • Jan 2005

Inpatient pediatric satisfaction: mean section score for "Overall Assessment" questions on Inpatient Pediatric Survey.

Inpatient pediatric survey. South Bend (IN): Press Ganey Associates, Inc.; 2004. 4 p.

This is the current release of the measure.

The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in April 2016.

Primary Measure Domain

Clinical Quality Measures: Patient Experience

Secondary Measure Domain

Does not apply to this measure

Description

This measure is used to assess the mean score for the questions in the "Overall Assessment" section of the Inpatient Pediatric Survey.

The "Overall Assessment" section is one of ten sections that comprise the Inpatient Pediatric Survey. Mean section scores are reported for each section of this survey. In addition, an "Overall Facility Rating" score is reported.

Rationale

  1. Patient satisfaction is both an indicator of quality of care, and a component of quality care.

    In 2001, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocated a patient-centered model of care (Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century). In part, this is a reflection of the growing understanding that

    "...patients constantly judge the motives and competence of caregivers through their interaction with them. This judgment is a very personal one, based on perceptions of care being responsive to patients' "individual needs," rather than to any universal code of standards (McGlynn, 1997). When these individual needs are perceived as being met, better care results. Lohr (1997) notes: "Inferior care results when health professionals lack full mastery of their clinical areas or cannot communicate effectively and compassionately." In short, when patients perceive motives, communication, empathy, and clinical judgment positively, they will respond more positively to care...Sobel (1995) claims that improved communication and interaction between caregiver and patient improves actual outcome. Donabedian (1988) notes that "...the interpersonal process is the vehicle by which technical care is implemented and on which its success depends" (from Press [2002] Patient Satisfaction: Defining, Measuring, and Improving the Experience of Care, Health Administration Press).

    It is clear that patients quite actively evaluate what is happening to them during the experience of care. The degree to which the patient judges the care experience as satisfactory "...is not only an indicator of the quality of care, but a component of quality care, as well" (Press, 2002).

    Patient Satisfaction has been linked to the following clinical outcomes: Clinical Quality (e.g., Hemoglobin A1c levels, cholesterol levels, lower bed disability days); Chronic Disease Control; Compliance; Drug Complications; Quality of Life; Emotional Health Status; Mental Health; Physical Functioning; Physical Health Status; Post-Surgery Complications; Post-Surgery Recovery Times; Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates; Unexpected Mortality; and Work Effectiveness (Clark, Drain, Malone, 2004).

  2. In addition to its connection to quality of care and clinical outcomes, Patient Satisfaction has been linked to the following:
    • Topline (Revenue): Loyalty; Volume; Physician Satisfaction; Patient's Trust in Provider; Retention; Employee Satisfaction
    • Bottomline (Expenses): Reduction in Expenses; Reduction in Length of Stay; Reduction in Complaints; Reduction in Malpractice Claims; Direct Measures of Financial Performance (e.g., bond rating, core margin, earnings per adjusted admission, market share, net margin, profit margin) (Clark, Drain, Malone, 2004)

Primary Health Components

Inpatient satisfaction

Denominator Description

Parents of patients with an inpatient pediatric care admission discharged during the reporting period who answered at least one question in the "Overall Assessment" section of the Inpatient Pediatric Survey. All deceased patients and newborns are excluded from sampling.

Numerator Description

The mean of all the parents' scores for the questions from the "Overall Assessment" section of the Inpatient Pediatric Survey

Refer to the "Press Ganey's Inpatient Pediatric Survey: Calculation of Scores Information" document listed in the "Companion Documents" field for additional details.

Type of Evidence Supporting the Criterion of Quality for the Measure

  • A formal consensus procedure, involving experts in relevant clinical, methodological, public health and organizational sciences
  • A systematic review of the clinical research literature (e.g., Cochrane Review)
  • Focus groups
  • One or more research studies published in a National Library of Medicine (NLM) indexed, peer-reviewed journal

Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure

Unspecified

Extent of Measure Testing

Psychometric testing of the survey, which was released in 1998, revealed the instrument to be valid and reliable, and to be a significant predictor or theoretically important outcomes such as the respondent's stated likelihood of recommending the hospital to others. Results of factor analysis of the instrument indicate a high degree of construct validity. Each item loaded most highly with its theoretically expected factor, and the factors identified mirror the subscales of the survey. In addition, Cronbach alpha (a measure of internal consistency or reliability) for the entire measure was .98 (with individual subscale alphas ranging from .65 to .95), confirming the instrument's high internal consistency and reliability. Moreover, multiple regression analyses showed that the survey items accounted for 78% of the variance in the families' stated likelihood to recommend the hospital to others (F44,342 = 30.95, P less than .01; Adjusted R2 = 0.78).

Refer to "Pediatric Inpatient Questionnaire: Psychometrics" document in the "Companion Documents" field for further information.

Evidence for Extent of Measure Testing

Miceli PJ, Clark PA. Your patient--my child: seven priorities for improving pediatric care from the parent's perspective. J Nurs Care Qual. 2005 Jan-Mar;20(1):43-53; quiz 54-5. [36 references] PubMed External Web Site Policy

State of Use

Current routine use

Current Use

Internal quality improvement

Measurement Setting

Hospital Inpatient

Professionals Involved in Delivery of Health Services

Does not apply to this measure (e.g., measure is not provider specific)

Least Aggregated Level of Services Delivery Addressed

Single Health Care Delivery or Public Health Organizations

Statement of Acceptable Minimum Sample Size

Unspecified

Target Population Age

Age less than 21 years

Target Population Gender

Either male or female

National Quality Strategy Aim

Better Care

National Quality Strategy Priority

Person- and Family-centered Care

IOM Care Need

End of Life Care

Getting Better

Living with Illness

IOM Domain

Patient-centeredness

Case Finding Period

The reporting period

Denominator Sampling Frame

Patients associated with provider

Denominator (Index) Event or Characteristic

Institutionalization

Patient/Individual (Consumer) Characteristic

Denominator Time Window

Does not apply to this measure

Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions

Inclusions
Parents of patients with an inpatient pediatric care admission discharged during the reporting period who answered at least one question in the "Overall Assessment" section of the Inpatient Pediatric Survey

Exclusions
All deceased patients and newborns are excluded from sampling.

Exclusions/Exceptions

Does not apply to this measure

Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions

Inclusions
The mean of all the parents' scores for the questions from the "Overall Assessment" section of the Inpatient Pediatric Survey

Refer to the "Press Ganey's Inpatient Pediatric Survey: Calculation of Scores Information" document listed in the "Companion Documents" field for additional details.

Exclusions
Unspecified

Numerator Search Strategy

Fixed time period or point in time

Data Source

Administrative clinical data

Patient/Individual survey

Type of Health State

Does not apply to this measure

Instruments Used and/or Associated with the Measure

Inpatient Pediatric Survey

Measure Specifies Disaggregation

Does not apply to this measure

Scoring

Composite/Scale

Mean/Median

Interpretation of Score

Desired value is a higher score

Allowance for Patient or Population Factors

Analysis by subgroup (stratification by individual factors, geographic factors, etc.)

Description of Allowance for Patient or Population Factors

Data may be reported out separately for various kinds of patient groups at the client's request.

Standard of Comparison

External comparison of time trends

Internal time comparison

Original Title

Inpatient Pediatric Survey, Overall Assessment.

Composite Measure Name

Inpatient Pediatric Survey

Submitter

Press Ganey Associates, Inc.

Developer

Press Ganey Associates, Inc.

Funding Source(s)

Press Ganey Associates, Inc.

Composition of the Group that Developed the Measure

Patients, providers, administrators, physicians, existing clients, Press Ganey Associates, Inc. employees

Financial Disclosures/Other Potential Conflicts of Interest

None known

Adaptation

This measure was not adapted from another source.

Date of Most Current Version in NQMC

2005 Jan

Measure Maintenance

Unspecified

Date of Next Anticipated Revision

Unspecified

Measure Status

This is the current release of the measure.

The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in April 2016.

Source(s)

Inpatient pediatric survey. South Bend (IN): Press Ganey Associates, Inc.; 2004. 4 p.

Measure Availability

Source not available electronically.

For further information, contact: Press Ganey, 404 Columbia Place, South Bend, Indiana 46601; telephone: 800-232-8032; fax: 574-232-3485; e-mail: rwolosin@pressganey.com; Web site: www.pressganey.com External Web Site Policy.

Companion Documents

The following is available:

  • Press Ganey's inpatient pediatric care study: calculation of scores information. South Bend (IN): Press Ganey Associates; 3 p.
  • Pediatric inpatient questionnaire: psychometrics. South Bend (IN): Press Ganey Associates, Inc.; 1999. 7 p.

For further information, contact: Press Ganey, 404 Columbia Place, South Bend, Indiana 46601; telephone: 800-232-8032; fax: 574-232-3485; e-mail: rwolosin@pressganey.com; Web site: www.pressganey.com External Web Site Policy.

NQMC Status

This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI on February 27, 2006. The information was verified by the measure developer on March 6, 2006.

This NQMC summary was retrofitted into the new template on July 7, 2011.

The information was reaffirmed by the measure developer on April 11, 2016.

Copyright Statement

© PRESS GANEY ASSOCIATES, INC. All Rights Reserved

All inquiries regarding the measure should be directed to the Press Ganey Web site External Web Site Policy or e-mail Robert Wolosin, Ph.D. at rwolosin@pressganey.com.

NQMC Disclaimer

The National Quality Measures Clearinghouseâ„¢ (NQMC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the measures represented on this site.

All measures summarized by NQMC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public and private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, individuals, and similar entities.

Measures represented on the NQMC Web site are submitted by measure developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NQMC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/about/inclusion-criteria.aspx.

NQMC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or its reliability and/or validity of the quality measures and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of measures represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NQMC, AHRQ, or its contractor, ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of measures in NQMC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding measure content are directed to contact the measure developer.