Measure Domain
Primary Measure Domain
Clinical Quality Measures: Structure
Secondary Measure Domain
Does not apply to this measure
Brief Abstract
Description
This measure is used to assess whether the institution that performs pancreatic cancer surgery performs greater than or equal to 12 cases per year.
Rationale
There is considerable variability in outcomes among hospitals in the United States for many procedures and medical conditions, particularly for complex surgeries such as pancreatectomy for malignancy. Short-term and long-term outcomes of patients at some hospitals are considerably worse than at other hospitals; however, it has been difficult to identify the factors responsible for this variability. Hospitals with poor outcomes are left with little guidance on where to focus quality improvement efforts. Thus, efforts have focused on identifying quality indicators or measures that can be used to standardize care and ensure that patients are managed in accordance with established recommendations.
Pancreatic cancer outcomes vary considerably among hospitals. Assessing pancreatic cancer care by using quality indicators could help reduce this variability.
Evidence for Rationale
| Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998 Nov 25;280(20):1747-51. PubMed |
| Bentrem DJ, Brennan MF. Outcomes in oncologic surgery: does volume make a difference. World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1210-6. [40 references] PubMed |
| Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, Talamonti MS, Ko CY, American College of Surgeons Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicator Development Expert Panel. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16;101(12):848-59. PubMed |
| Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes. J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr;198(4):626-32. [27 references] PubMed |
| Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37. PubMed |
| Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Goldfaden A, Birkmeyer NJ, Stukel TA. Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery. Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2476-81. PubMed |
| Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA. Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):777-83. PubMed |
| Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF. Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg. 2005 Oct;242(4):540-4; discussion 544-7. PubMed |
| Gordon TA, Bowman HM, Tielsch JM, Bass EB, Burleyson GP, Cameron JL. Statewide regionalization of pancreaticoduodenectomy and its effect on in-hospital mortality. Ann Surg. 1998 Jul;228(1):71-8. PubMed |
| Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17;137(6):511-20. [115 references] PubMed |
| Ko CY, Maggard M, Agustin M. Quality in surgery: current issues for the future. World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1204-9. [51 references] PubMed |
| Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995 Nov;222(5):638-45. PubMed |
Primary Health Components
Pancreatic cancer surgery; case volume
Denominator Description
This measure applies to institutions that perform pancreatic cancer surgery (one institution at a time).
Numerator Description
The institution that performs pancreatic cancer surgery performs greater than or equal to 12 cases per year.
Evidence Supporting the Measure
Type of Evidence Supporting the Criterion of Quality for the Measure
- A formal consensus procedure, involving experts in relevant clinical, methodological, public health and organizational sciences
Additional Information Supporting Need for the Measure
Unspecified
Extent of Measure Testing
Potential quality indicators were identified from the literature, consensus guidelines, and interviews with experts. A panel of 20 pancreatic cancer experts ranked potential quality indicators for validity based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology. The rankings were rated as valid (high or moderate validity) or not valid. Adherence with valid indicators at both the patient and the hospital levels and a composite measure of adherence at the hospital level were assessed using data from the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2005) for 49,065 patients treated at 1,134 hospitals. Summary statistics were calculated for each individual candidate quality indicator to assess the median ranking and distribution. Of the 50 potential quality indicators identified, 43 were rated as valid (29 as high and 14 as moderate validity).
Refer to the reference listed below for further details.
Evidence for Extent of Measure Testing
| Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, Talamonti MS, Ko CY, American College of Surgeons Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicator Development Expert Panel. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16;101(12):848-59. PubMed |
State of Use of the Measure
State of Use
Current routine use
Current Use
Certification
Internal quality improvement
Monitoring and planning
Application of the Measure in its Current Use
Measurement Setting
Hospital Inpatient
Professionals Involved in Delivery of Health Services
Does not apply to this measure (e.g., measure is not provider specific)
Least Aggregated Level of Services Delivery Addressed
Single Health Care Delivery or Public Health Organizations
Statement of Acceptable Minimum Sample Size
Does not apply to this measure
Target Population Age
Does not apply to this measure
Target Population Gender
Does not apply to this measure
National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care
National Quality Strategy Aim
Better Care
Institute of Medicine (IOM) National Health Care Quality Report Categories
Data Collection for the Measure
Case Finding Period
Annual
Denominator Sampling Frame
Health care or public health organization
Denominator (Index) Event or Characteristic
Health Care/Public Health Organization Characteristic
Denominator Time Window
Does not apply to this measure
Denominator Inclusions/Exclusions
Inclusions
This measure applies to institutions that perform pancreatic cancer surgery (one institution at a time).
Exclusions
None
Exclusions/Exceptions
Does not apply to this measure
Numerator Inclusions/Exclusions
Inclusions
The institution that performs pancreatic cancer surgery performs greater than or equal to 12 cases per year.
Exclusions
None
Numerator Search Strategy
Fixed time period or point in time
Data Source
Administrative clinical data
Paper medical record
Registry data
Type of Health State
Does not apply to this measure
Instruments Used and/or Associated with the Measure
Unspecified
Computation of the Measure
Measure Specifies Disaggregation
Does not apply to this measure
Scoring
Dichotomous
Interpretation of Score
Desired value is presence of a characteristic
Allowance for Patient or Population Factors
Does not apply to this measure
Standard of Comparison
External comparison at a point in, or interval of, time
External comparison of time trends
Internal time comparison
Prescriptive standard
Prescriptive Standard
Greater than or equal to 12 cases per year
Evidence for Prescriptive Standard
| Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998 Nov 25;280(20):1747-51. PubMed |
Identifying Information
Original Title
If an institution performs pancreatic cancer surgery, then the institution should perform ≥12 cases per year.
Measure Collection Name
Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicators
Submitter
Karl Y. Bilimoria, MD, MS on behalf of the American College of Surgeons' Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicator Development Expert Panel - Independent Author(s)
Developer
American College of Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society
Funding Source(s)
- American College of Surgeons, Clinical Scholars in Residence program to Karl Y. Bilimoria
- American Cancer Society, Illinois Division to David J. Bentrem
- National Cancer Institute to Clifford Y. Ko
Composition of the Group that Developed the Measure
The American College of Surgeons' Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicator Development Expert Panel included surgeons (Peter J. Allen, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Gerard V. Aranha, MD, Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Chicago; David J. Bentrem, MD, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Douglas B. Evans, MD, M.D. Medical College of Wisconsin; Keith D. Lillemoe, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine; Peter W. T. Pisters, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center; Richard D. Schulick, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Stephen F. Sener, MD, NorthShore University HealthSystem; Mark S. Talamonti, MD, NorthShore University HealthSystem; Selwyn M. Vickers, MD, University of Minnesota; Andrew L. Warshaw, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Charles J. Yeo, MD, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University), medical oncologists (David P. Kelsen, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; Vincent J. Picozzi, MD, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Margaret A. Tempero, MD, University of California at San Francisco Medical Center), radiation oncologists (Ross A. Abrams, MD, Rush University Medical Center; Christopher G. Willett, MD, Duke University School of Medicine), a pathologist (N. Volkan Adsay, MD, Emory University School of Medicine), a radiologist (Alec J. Megibow, MD, MPH, New York University Medical Center), and a gastroenterologist (Stuart Sherman, MD, Indiana University School of Medicine).
Financial Disclosures/Other Potential Conflicts of Interest
Unspecified
Adaptation
This measure was not adapted from another source.
Date of Most Current Version in NQMC
2009 Jun
Measure Maintenance
Unspecified
Date of Next Anticipated Revision
This is the current release of the measure.
Measure Status
This is the current release of the measure.
The measure developer reaffirmed the currency of this measure in January 2017.
Source(s)
| Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, Talamonti MS, Ko CY, American College of Surgeons Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicator Development Expert Panel. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16;101(12):848-59. PubMed |
Measure Availability
Source available from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute Web site
.
For more information, contact Karl Bilimoria, MD, MS, Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 633 Clark Street, Evanston, IL 60208; Email: k-bilimoria@northwestern.edu.
NQMC Status
This NQMC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on February 22, 2012. The information was verified by the measure developer on March 16, 2012.
The information was reaffirmed by the measure developer on January 31, 2017.
Copyright Statement
This quality indicator has been published publicly. Copyright American College of Surgeons 2009.
Disclaimer
NQMC Disclaimer
The National Quality Measures Clearinghouse™ (NQMC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the measures represented on this site.
All measures summarized by NQMC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public and private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, individuals, and similar entities.
Measures represented on the NQMC Web site are submitted by measure developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NQMC Inclusion Criteria.
NQMC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or its reliability and/or validity of the quality measures and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of measures represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NQMC, AHRQ, or its contractor, ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of measures in NQMC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding measure content are directed to contact the measure developer.